by Roland Hulme
In January, I began the Peter Leeds project – an impartial,
in-depth analysis of the Penny Stocks service offered by much touted guru Peter
Leeds. I had a comment the other day demanding to know where my latest report
was – so here’s an update.
![]() |
| Is Peter Leeds worth the money? |
It’s been just over four months since I paid the $195
subscription to Peter Leeds' penny stock services and the fact that I’m writing my Peter Leeds review
from a desk in New York City and not a beach in the Caribbean is a good
indication of just how successful I’ve been on it.
I haven’t made my fortune thanks
to Peter. In fact, I haven’t made a penny.
But first off, I should preface that by admitting my own
financial participation in his stock recommendations has been limited. I picked
one or two stocks he recommended and, as of this writing, have lost a little on
both of them. Then again, he recommends one stock every week, so you’re kind of
spinning a roulette wheel when you decide which one to go with.
On the whole, though, I haven’t come across thinking that
there’s some kind of Peter Leeds scam going on. Peter Leeds does come across
like a genuine, honest guy. He doesn’t make any wild or outlandish promises
about becoming rich from penny stocks, and it seems his much touted “method”
for picking solid stocks in cemented in cold, objective analysis.
The being said, the stocks he recommends are not all consistent performers.
I analyzed his most recent stock picks and gave them a VERY
generous assessment, looking at their performance to see if there was any point
in which investors would have been able to make money.
According to my figures,
out of the past seven stocks he recommended, only three would have offered the
opportunity to take a profit – and only one (at 40%) offered any significant
increase.
The rest flunked – losing at their best between 7% and 17% from
my calculations.
In his defense, these figures are based on a mere three
months; and the economy has not been great for stocks no matter how low they’re
priced. Yet when somebody invests money in a stock subscription service, they’re
not paying for excuses – they’re paying for results.
No matter which way you cut the mustard, my impression so
far from Peter Leeds Penny Stocks is that you’re NOT going to get an easy,
convenient source of quickly performing penny stocks by subscribing; just some
rational, ethical recommendations that would, theoretically, at least protect
you against loses.
And if you’re in it for the long haul – who knows? One of
Peter’s recommendations recently spiked by 75%; which is a nice little payday
for those who bought into it.
But the issue is – with so many recommendations being made,
how do you know which one is going to be “the one” that hits the big time? And,
more importantly, when do you know when to sell?
And that’s really the big issue. In my admittedly unscientific
calculations, I rated Peter Leeds’ stock picks on how much money you COULD have
made if you’d sold at the right time. The fact is, you could have made less –
or even a loss – at other points.
To Peter Leeds’ credit, the one recent stock pick that
spiked at more than 40% from when he recommended it hit exactly on his short
term sell recommendation. His others haven’t met that point yet – so while I
argue about profits and loss, if you’d been listening to his recommendations you’d
still be holding onto those stocks.
Ultimately, my verdict on Peter Leeds’ penny stocks service
in the short term is that you will NOT make significant amounts of money on it,
but it’s certainly not a scam, either.
Peter Leeds presents himself as an ethical guy, and he
obviously does fulfill the research and analysis he promises before
recommending stocks.
As a result, none of his picks have vanished, been frozen by
the SEC or crashed to a fraction of their former worth – and anybody who’s been
dabbling in penny stocks for a while will know that these misadventures are
more commonly the rule than the exception.
Yet does this deliver sufficient value for the nearly $200
annual subscription? Given that his stock picks have had inconsistent
performance in the time I’ve been looking at them, I’d be cautious about saying
that it does. People invest in stock subscriptions to MAKE money; not simply
fail to lose too much of it.
As of this point – nearly four months into my subscription –
I would say don’t bother investing in the Peter Leeds Penny Stocks service.
There’s no Peter Leeds scam, but I don’t think it genuinely offers sufficient
value for money given what most penny stock investor’s expectations and
investment budgets are.
But I will admit that of all the penny stock services out
there, Peter Leeds’ is definitely the most transparent, and he comes across as
the most ethical and genuine of the investment gurus people follow. I’d take
him over Jim Kramer any day of the week.
And the final verdict isn’t in. I can’t claim a refund for
my subscription, so I will be sending (nonspecific) updates on the performance of the stocks
he recommends throughout the year* – plus all the other things you get for
signing up.
If I change my mind about Peter Leed’s Penny Stocks, I’ll
let you know.
* Because Peter Leeds created his penny stock site to make money, I will not be giving away any of the recommendations we subscribers have to pay for - just report on the general performance of his stock tips.
* Because Peter Leeds created his penny stock site to make money, I will not be giving away any of the recommendations we subscribers have to pay for - just report on the general performance of his stock tips.

